There is cultural and institutional interdependence between members of any community, especially the members of any team striving for mutant justice within a flatscan society. Back when Vealinger reamarked “the power struggle will continue while the great tale of humanity remains untold,” he created a monster which society has been attempting to tame ever since. Much like Wolverine. While the western world use a knife and fork, the Chinese use chopsticks. While Canada uses Alpha Flight, we in America rejoice in our plentitude of X-teams. Why shouldn’t we?
Let’s forgo asking the question “Why didn’t Marx forsee mutantcy in his historical dialectic?” The answers to that query would hit us in the face like a pie full of iron truths: either Marx was himself a mutant, or perhaps he was just a moron, like so many ro-men of that era. Ro-man want to be hu-man. This transition was impossible until the advent of the showy guzzler.
Back to the topic at hand: if one examines cultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept Debordist situation or conclude that sexuality is fundamentally used in the service of outmoded perceptions of culture, given that language is distinct from consciousness. But Wolverine is both the ur-man in his hairy masculinihilismity and the ultimate woman by virtue of the fact that he grows flesh, by his healing factor. Forgetting for a fact that Wolverine is expending the surely finite resources of an extradimensional Meatspace by regrowing his bodily tissues, Wolvie has himself become a wombless woman, in a neat inversion of crazy Freud’s sex calculus. X-man wants to be hu-man.
Any number of deconstructivisms concerning modernist discourse may be revealed. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a that includes language as a totality. Wolverine can never be a full totality; he is, rather, a mass of Tiny Wolverines, each growing out of the bodyflesh chunks James Howlett has left after multiple battles on multiple continents. These chunks o’ flesh, like the central Wolverine husk, must surely have a holographic tendency to grow a full replication of the same body from which they sprung. However, with limited flesh to grow and shape, these flesh chunks would over time form into Wolverine-shaped masses of small statue; i.e., Tiny Wolverines. Perhaps these Tiny Wolverines would themselves, after tiny battles, shed flesh chunks of their own, further engendering a race of Tiny Tiny Wolverines, onto ad infinitum. In this, Wolverine is no mere mutant. Wolverine is a fractal proposition.
Lyotard’s essay on cultural theory suggests that the significance of the writer is significant form. Wolverine, as a fractal superorganism, has no significant form, merely a sniktin’ form. In a sense, the stasis of Wolverine in the Claremont era, andof precapitalist deconstructivist theory intrinsic to Rushdie’s Satanic Verses is also evident in Midnight’s Children, although in a more mythopoetical sense. But what is Wolverine but pure mythopoeticism?
Look, bitches: the premise of Debordist situation holds that sexual identity has intrinsic meaning, but only if subcapitalist libertarianism is invalid. But Lacan promotes the use of Debordist situation to attack sexism. Wolverine having no sex, a genderless canucklehead, he is the Situationist homunculus-idea made perfect, and manifest.
Also, Tiny Wolverine. TINY WOLVERINE.
![[popup]](http://www.thellanoidea.com/metropolis/wp-content/plugins/shout-stream/popup.png "[popup]")
